🔗 Share this article

When dawn illuminated the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained trapped in a windowless conference room, unaware whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in difficult discussions, with numerous ministers representing 17 groups of countries ranging from the poorest nations to the wealthiest economies.

Frustration mounted, the air stifling as exhausted delegates faced up to the sobering reality: they were unlikely to achieve a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference teetered on the brink of abject failure.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for well over a century, the carbon dioxide produced by utilizing fossil fuels is heating up our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during more than three decades of regular climate meetings, the crucial requirement to stop fossil fuel use has been mentioned only once – in a agreement made two years ago at the Dubai climate summit to "move beyond fossil fuels". Officials from the Arab Group, Russia, and multiple other countries were adamant this would not happen again.

Mounting support for change

Meanwhile, a increasing coalition of countries were similarly resolved that progress on this issue was crucially important. They had developed a initiative that was gathering increasing support and made it clear they were willing to dig in.

Less wealthy nations urgently needed to move forward on securing economic resources to help them manage the growing impacts of extreme weather.

Critical moment

In the pre-dawn period of Saturday, some delegates were ready to withdraw and cause breakdown. "We were close for us," remarked one national delegate. "I considered to walk away."

The breakthrough happened through discussions with Saudi Arabia. Around 6am, senior representatives left the main group to hold a private conversation with the head Saudi negotiator. They encouraged text that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "shift from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unanticipated resolution

Instead of explicitly mentioning fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Following reflection, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly approved the wording.

Participants expressed relief. Applause rang out. The agreement was completed.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took a modest advance towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a uncertain, inadequate step that will minimally impact the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a important shift from complete stagnation.

Key elements of the agreement

• Complementing the subtle acknowledgment in the legally agreed text, countries will start developing a framework to systematically reduce fossil fuels
• This will be largely a non-binding program led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to remain below the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries achieved a threefold increase to $120bn of yearly funding to help them adapt to the impacts of extreme weather
• This funding will not be fully available until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "just transition mechanism" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors move toward the sustainable sector

Differing opinions

As the world teeters on the brink of climate "irreversible changes" that could eliminate habitats and plunge whole regions into crisis, the agreement was insufficient as the "giant leap" needed.

"The summit provided some small advances in the right direction, but considering the severity of the climate crisis, it has fallen short of the occasion," warned one environmental analyst.

This limited deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the international tensions – including a American leader who shunned the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the rising tide of rightwing populism, continuing wars in various areas, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Fossil fuel corporations – the fossil fuel giants – were finally in the spotlight at the climate summit," comments one climate activist. "This represents progress on that. The opportunity is accessible. Now we must transform it into a actual pathway to a safer world."

Deep fissures revealed

While nations were able to applaud the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also revealed major disagreements in the only global process for tackling the climate crisis.

"Climate conferences are consensus-based, and in a time of international tensions, unanimity is progressively challenging to reach," observed one international diplomat. "We should not suggest that these talks has achieved complete success that is needed. The difference between where we are and what evidence necessitates remains alarmingly large."

Should the world is to prevent the gravest consequences of climate crisis, the global discussions alone will prove insufficient.